RT for crt.cs.wisc.edu
RT for crt.cs.wisc.edu
|
|
| # | Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008 | sfiligoi@fnal.gov - Ticket created | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Hi Alain and Scot. I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. It builds on x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. BTW: I am failing on x86_64_rhap_5 because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. Cheers, Igor |
||||||||||||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 12:33:16 2008 | roy - Cc garzogli@fnal.gov added | ||
| # | Thu Nov 13 14:46:31 2008 | roy - Taken | ||
| # | Thu Nov 13 14:49:13 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |
|
Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the security issues we talked about a few months ago? automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use it? You can do the following: prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 or prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 Can you try a build with that? Thanks! -alain ----------------------------------------------------------------- Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: > Hi Alain and Scot. > > I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. > > It builds on x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 > > These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. > > BTW: I am failing on > x86_64_rhap_5 > because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. > > Cheers, > Igor |
||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 14:49:14 2008 | RT_System - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' | ||
| # | Thu Nov 13 15:15:10 2008 | sfiligoi@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Alain Roy via RT wrote: > Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the security Yes!> issues we talked about a few months ago? This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. > Not yet.> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use it? > > You can do the following: > > prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 > > or > > prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 > > Can you try a build with that? They added this packages a few hours ago. I am sending a build now... will let you know. Cheers, Igor > > Thanks! > -alain > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org > VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html > > > On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >> Hi Alain and Scot. > >> >> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >> >> It builds on x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >> >> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >> >> BTW: I am failing on >> x86_64_rhap_5 >> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >> >> Cheers, >> Igor > > > |
||||||||||||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 16:10:10 2008 | sfiligoi@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
It failed in SL5 x86_64. Cannot find ldap.h. Igor Sfiligoi Igor wrote: > Alain Roy via RT wrote: >> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the security > Yes!>> issues we talked about a few months ago? > > This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. > >> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use it? > Not yet.>> >> You can do the following: >> >> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 >> >> or >> >> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 >> >> Can you try a build with that? > > They added this packages a few hours ago. > I am sending a build now... will let you know. > > Cheers, > Igor > >> Thanks! > >> -alain >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >> >> >> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >>> Hi Alain and Scot. >>>>> >>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >>> >>> It builds on x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >>> >>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >>> >>> BTW: I am failing on >>> x86_64_rhap_5 >>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Igor >> >> |
||||||||||||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 18:19:11 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
I don't think we can, or should, rely on LDAP being pre-installed. If it was pre-installed on other computers, we were lucky. If we want it to build against LDAP, we should bring it along. Do we need the LDAP stuff in glexec? -alain On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:10 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 > > It failed in SL5 x86_64. > > Cannot find ldap.h. > > Igor > > Sfiligoi Igor wrote: >> Alain Roy via RT wrote: >>> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the >> Yes!>>> security >>> issues we talked about a few months ago? >> >> This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. >> >>> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use >> Not yet.>>> it? >>> >>> You can do the following: >>> >>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 >>> >>> or >>> >>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 >>> >>> Can you try a build with that? >> >> They added this packages a few hours ago. >> I am sending a build now... will let you know. >> >> Cheers, >> Igor >> >>> Thanks! >>>>> -alain >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >>> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >>> >>> >>> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >>>> Hi Alain and Scot. >>>>>>> >>>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >>>> >>>> It builds on >>>> x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >>>> >>>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >>>> >>>> BTW: I am failing on >>>> x86_64_rhap_5 >>>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Igor >>> >>> |
||||||||||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 18:29:10 2008 | sfiligoi@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
It gets in with the dependencies. Oscar may want to comment. Igor PS: The build logs can be found here: http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114090 ----- Original Message ----- From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:19 pm Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov > I don't think we can, or should, rely on LDAP being pre-installed. If > > it was pre-installed on other computers, we were lucky. If we want it > > to build against LDAP, we should bring it along. > > Do we need the LDAP stuff in glexec? > > -alain > > On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:10 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > > http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 > > > > > It failed in SL5 x86_64. > > > > Cannot find ldap.h. > > > > Igor > > > > Sfiligoi Igor wrote: > >> Alain Roy via RT wrote: > >>> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the > >> Yes!> >>> security > >>> issues we talked about a few months ago? > >> > >> This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. > >> > >>> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use > >>> it? > >> Not yet.> >>> > >>> You can do the following: > >>> > >>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 > >>> > >>> or > >>> > >>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 > >>> > >>> Can you try a build with that? > >> > >> They added this packages a few hours ago. > >> I am sending a build now... will let you know. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Igor > >> > >>> Thanks! > >>> >>> -alain > >>> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org > >>> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: > >>>> Hi Alain and Scot. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. > >>>> > >>>> It builds on > >>>> x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 > >>>> > >>>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. > >>>> > >>>> BTW: I am failing on > >>>> x86_64_rhap_5 > >>>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Igor > >>> > >>> > > -- > View ticket at < > VDT Support: vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org |
||||||||||||||
| # | Thu Nov 13 19:15:31 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
So you mean that it should be brought along already? In that case, I don't think there's much I can do to help. Perhaps Oscar can help, as you say. -alain On Nov 13, 2008, at 4:29 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 > > It gets in with the dependencies. > > Oscar may want to comment. > > Igor > > PS: The build logs can be found here: > http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114090 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:19 pm > Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 > To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov > Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov > > >> I don't think we can, or should, rely on LDAP being pre-installed. If >> >> it was pre-installed on other computers, we were lucky. If we want it >> >> to build against LDAP, we should bring it along. >> >> Do we need the LDAP stuff in glexec? >> >> -alain >> >> On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:10 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: >>> http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 >>>>> >>> It failed in SL5 x86_64. >>> >>> Cannot find ldap.h. >>> >>> Igor >>> >>> Sfiligoi Igor wrote: >>>> Alain Roy via RT wrote: >>>>> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the >>>> Yes!>>>>> security >>>>> issues we talked about a few months ago? >>>> >>>> This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. >>>> >>>>> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use >>>>> it? >>>> Not yet.>>>>> >>>>> You can do the following: >>>>> >>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 >>>>> >>>>> or >>>>> >>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 >>>>> >>>>> Can you try a build with that? >>>> >>>> They added this packages a few hours ago. >>>> I am sending a build now... will let you know. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Igor >>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> -alain >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >>>>> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >>>>>> Hi Alain and Scot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >>>>>> >>>>>> It builds on >>>>>> x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >>>>>> >>>>>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW: I am failing on >>>>>> x86_64_rhap_5 >>>>>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Igor >>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> View ticket at < >> VDT Support: vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org |
||||||||||||
| # | Fri Nov 14 03:05:16 2008 | okoeroo@nikhef.nl - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Hi Igor, Gabriele and Alain, The lcmaps-plugins-basic package holds a few LCMAPS plugins, like the (DN based) localaccount, (DN based) poolaccount, posix_enforcement (setuid, setgid, setgroups), a good and bad dummy plugin and an ldap-enforcement plugin. The ldap_enf plugin will enforce the mapping in the LDAP space (when explicitly configured of course). The basic library binaries for LDAP are usually available on the systems. During the build of this module in the package ldap-devel is assumed to be available. For completeness sake I hope that's not a problem to add the ldap-devel package on the build machines so that the lcmaps-plugins-basic package can still be packaged. Besides the other plugins I think that the basic good and bad dummy packages can come quite handy when slighty more complex plugin execution policies need to be defined. cheers, Oscar Igor Sfiligoi wrote: > It gets in with the dependencies. > > Oscar may want to comment. > > Igor > > PS: The build logs can be found here: > http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114090 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:19 pm > Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 > To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov > Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov > > >> I don't think we can, or should, rely on LDAP being pre-installed. If >> >> it was pre-installed on other computers, we were lucky. If we want it >> >> to build against LDAP, we should bring it along. >> >> Do we need the LDAP stuff in glexec? >> >> -alain >> >> On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:10 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: >>> http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 >> >>> >>> It failed in SL5 x86_64. >>> >>> Cannot find ldap.h. >>> >>> Igor >>> >>> Sfiligoi Igor wrote: >>>> Alain Roy via RT wrote: >>>>> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the >>>> Yes!>>>>> security >>>>> issues we talked about a few months ago? >>>> >>>> This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. >>>> >>>>> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to use >>>>> it? >>>> Not yet.>>>>> >>>>> You can do the following: >>>>> >>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 >>>>> >>>>> or >>>>> >>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 >>>>> >>>>> Can you try a build with that? >>>> >>>> They added this packages a few hours ago. >>>> I am sending a build now... will let you know. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Igor >>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> -alain >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >>>>> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >>>>>> Hi Alain and Scot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >>>>>> >>>>>> It builds on >>>>>> x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >>>>>> >>>>>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW: I am failing on >>>>>> x86_64_rhap_5 >>>>>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Igor >>>>> >> -- >> View ticket at < >> VDT Support: vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org |
||||||||||||||
| # | Fri Nov 14 09:32:37 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
My understanding is that we (the VDT) doesn't need this LDAP module at all, since we're using the interface to GUMS. Can we simply disable LDAP? I might be able to request LDAP to be installed on some computers, but in general I can't assume that it's pre-installed on a computer. We can have a long discussion about the philosophy of building software, but suffice it to say that it's tricky for us to rely on software being pre-installed. In this case, I would rather just turn it off, rather than mess around with the installation. -alain On Nov 14, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Oscar Koeroo via RT wrote: > http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 > > Hi Igor, Gabriele and Alain, > > The lcmaps-plugins-basic package holds a few LCMAPS plugins, like the > (DN based) localaccount, (DN based) poolaccount, posix_enforcement > (setuid, setgid, setgroups), a good and bad dummy plugin and an > ldap-enforcement plugin. > > > The ldap_enf plugin will enforce the mapping in the LDAP space (when > explicitly configured of course). The basic library binaries for LDAP > are usually available on the systems. > > During the build of this module in the package ldap-devel is assumed > to > be available. > > For completeness sake I hope that's not a problem to add the ldap- > devel > package on the build machines so that the lcmaps-plugins-basic package > can still be packaged. Besides the other plugins I think that the > basic > good and bad dummy packages can come quite handy when slighty more > complex plugin execution policies need to be defined. > > > cheers, > > Oscar > > > > Igor Sfiligoi wrote: >> It gets in with the dependencies. >> >> Oscar may want to comment. >> >> Igor >> >> PS: The build logs can be found here: >> http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114090 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> >> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:19 pm >> Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 >> To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov >> Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov >> >> >>> I don't think we can, or should, rely on LDAP being pre-installed. >>> If >>> >>> it was pre-installed on other computers, we were lucky. If we want >>> it >>> >>> to build against LDAP, we should bring it along. >>> >>> Do we need the LDAP stuff in glexec? >>> >>> -alain >>> >>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 2:10 PM, sfiligoi@fnal.gov via RT wrote: >>>> http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 >>>>>>> >>>> It failed in SL5 x86_64. >>>> >>>> Cannot find ldap.h. >>>> >>>> Igor >>>> >>>> Sfiligoi Igor wrote: >>>>> Alain Roy via RT wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for your work on the new glexec! Does this one fix the >>>>> Yes!>>>>>> security >>>>>> issues we talked about a few months ago? >>>>> >>>>> This includes the latest greatest version from gLite. >>>>> >>>>>> automake is installed an nmi-0104 as a prereq. Does it work to >>>>>> use >>>>>> it? >>>>> Not yet.>>>>>> >>>>>> You can do the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.10 >>>>>> >>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>> prereqs_x86_64_rhap_5 = automake-1.9.2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you try a build with that? >>>>> >>>>> They added this packages a few hours ago. >>>>> I am sending a build now... will let you know. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Igor >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> -alain >>>>>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >>>>>> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu Nov 13 09:58:32 2008, sfiligoi@fnal.gov wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Alain and Scot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have tagged GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It builds on >>>>>>> x86_rhas_3,x86_rhas_4,x86_rhap_5,x86_64_rhas_3,x86_64_rhas_4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These are the same platforms the previous tag was builing on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW: I am failing on >>>>>>> x86_64_rhap_5 >>>>>>> because automake is not installed on nmi-0104. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Igor |
||||||||||||
| # | Fri Nov 14 16:27:09 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
Igor-- The x86_64_rhap_5 computer now has the ldap-devel RPM installed. Wanna try again? Thanks, -alain ----------------------------------------------------------------- Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html |
||||||||||||
| # | Fri Nov 14 21:34:09 2008 | sfiligoi@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
It worked: http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114311 Thanks, Igor ----- Original Message ----- From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> Date: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:27 pm Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov > Igor-- > > The x86_64_rhap_5 computer now has the ldap-devel RPM installed. Wanna > > try again? > > Thanks, > -alain > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org > VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html > > > -- > View ticket at < > VDT Support: vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org |
||||||||||||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 09:08:57 2008 | garzogli@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Great! Alain, can you let us know the schedule to have the new gLExec packaged in VDT? What can we do to help? Thanks Gabriele Igor Sfiligoi wrote: > It worked: > http://nmi-s001.cs.wisc.edu/nmi/index.php?page=results/runDetails&runid=114311 > > Thanks, > Igor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alain Roy via RT <vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org> > Date: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:27 pm > Subject: Re: [vdt-support #4361] GLEXEC-OSG_v0_6 > To: sfiligoi@fnal.gov > Cc: garzogli@fnal.gov > > > >> Igor-- >> >> The x86_64_rhap_5 computer now has the ldap-devel RPM installed. Wanna >> >> try again? >> >> Thanks, >> -alain >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >> VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html >> >> >> -- >> View ticket at < >> VDT Support: vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org >> |
||||||||||||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 09:46:34 2008 | roy - Priority changed from (no value) to '3' | ||
| # | Mon Nov 17 09:46:35 2008 | roy - Queue changed from vdt-support to vdt-internal | ||
| # | Mon Nov 17 09:46:36 2008 | roy - Fix scheduled CUR added | ||
| # | Mon Nov 17 13:35:46 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
On Nov 17, 2008, at 9:09 AM, garzogli@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 > > Great! > > Alain, > can you let us know the schedule to have the new gLExec packaged in > VDT? > What can we do to help? I'm trying the build now. If all works as expected, we'll combine it with GUMS and PRIMA, since it's all authorization-related. Does that seem reasonable to you? I think Scot Kronenfeld will contact Igor separately. If possible, we would like to test glexec as part of our daily VDT tests, which we haven't done to date. It's not essential, but it would be a good thing. So hopefully we can get that rolling. Thanks, -alain |
||||||||||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 13:56:50 2008 | garzoglio@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Hi, Alain Roy via RT wrote: > On Nov 17, 2008, at 9:09 AM, garzogli@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > >> http://crt.cs.wisc.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=4361 >>> >> Great! >> >> Alain, >> can you let us know the schedule to have the new gLExec packaged in >> VDT? >> What can we do to help? >> > I'm trying the build now. If all works as expected, we'll combine it > with GUMS and PRIMA, since it's all authorization-related. Does that > seem reasonable to you? > That is very good. Does this mean that VDT will have a test cash for GUMS and PRIMA that VTB/ITB can start using OR they'll need to wait for gLExec to be in the mix to access any of these? Sorry... I guess I don't have a good feeling of how long packaging of gLExec will take. > I think Scot Kronenfeld will contact Igor separately. If possible, we > would like to test glexec as part of our daily VDT tests, which we > haven't done to date. It's not essential, but it would be a good > thing. So hopefully we can get that rolling. > If this can be arranged, it is a good thing. Thank you Gabriele > Thanks, > -alain > > > |
||||||||||||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 14:18:17 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |
|
> Does this mean that VDT will have a test cash for GUMS and PRIMA that > VTB/ITB can start using OR they'll need to wait for gLExec to be in the > mix to access any of these? Sorry... I guess I don't have a good feeling > of how long packaging of gLExec will take. It should be in the same cache. Assuming the build goes smoothly, glexec will be packaged today. -alain ----------------------------------------------------------------- Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html |
||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 15:06:26 2008 | garzoglio@fnal.gov - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||||
Great! I was talking to Igor and he mentioned that the installation script should be slightly different from what is currently in VDT. He sent email to you previously, so you might know everything about this already... Thanks Gabriele Alain Roy via RT wrote: >> Does this mean that VDT will have a test cash for GUMS and PRIMA that >>> VTB/ITB can start using OR they'll need to wait for gLExec to be in the >> mix to access any of these? Sorry... I guess I don't have a good feeling >> of how long packaging of gLExec will take. >> > It should be in the same cache. Assuming the build goes smoothly, glexec > will be packaged today. > > -alain > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Alain Roy vdt-support@opensciencegrid.org > VDT Support http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/support.html > > > > |
||||||||||||||
| # | Mon Nov 17 15:11:15 2008 | roy - Correspondence added | [Reply] | |||||||||
I think I lost track of it. Can Igor remind me? -alain On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:06 PM, garzoglio@fnal.gov via RT wrote: > Great! > > I was talking to Igor and he mentioned that the installation script > should be slightly different from what is currently in VDT. He sent > email to you previously, so you might know everything about this > already... |
||||||||||||
| # | Fri Dec 12 13:42:21 2008 | kronenfe - Reference by ticket #4555 added | ||
| # | Thu Jan 22 12:40:33 2009 | kronenfe - Cc kronenfe added | ||
| # | Thu Feb 12 18:41:54 2009 | kronenfe - Reference by ticket #4846 added | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:26:37 2009 | kronenfe - Reference by ticket #4985 added | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:28:25 2009 | kronenfe - Reference by ticket #4690 added | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:31:44 2009 | kronenfe - Stolen from roy | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:32:10 2009 | kronenfe - Cc kronenfe deleted | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:32:11 2009 | kronenfe - AdminCc roy added | ||
| # | Fri Feb 27 14:38:08 2009 | kronenfe - Priority changed from '3' to '-3' | ||
| # | Tue Apr 21 15:58:22 2009 | kronenfe - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' | ||
| # | Tue Apr 21 15:58:29 2009 | kronenfe - Fixed in 1.10.1v added | ||
Time to display: 3.286214
»|« RT 3.8.2 Copyright 1996-2008 Best Practical Solutions, LLC.
